Skip to main content

How Catastrophic is 1 Degree Celsius?

Climate change is one of the biggest challenges we face today, and the stakes could not be higher. The world has become keenly aware of the problem, and around the world, people are setting goals to solve it. To avoid the worst effects of a warming world- which will be catastrophic-humans need to stop adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. 

Since 1850 global average temperature has risen by 1 degree Celsius. That may not sound like a significant number, but it is. 


Why? Let's find out.


One degree is average. Many places on earth have gotten much warmer than that. Some areas in the Arctic have already warmed by 4 degrees. If the global average temperature increases by one more degree (total increase of 2 degrees), the coldest nights in the Arctic might get ten degrees warmer, and the warmest days in Mumbai might get 5 degrees hotter. 

Wonder how do we get here? Everything we do is related to fossil fuels: Coal, Oil, and Gas, which are full of carbon that releases carbon dioxide, which builds up in the atmosphere. It can remain there for thousands of years, letting heat in but preventing it from going out. Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane, which are emitted by burning Coal, Oil, and Gas doesn't allow heat to escape and, in turn, warms up the planet. 


It is believed that global warming temperatures breaking the 1.5-degree target will see significant climate change catastrophes and effects taking place in several different countries


"There is no going back- no matter what we do now, it's too late to avoid climate change and the poorest, the most vulnerable, those with the least security, are now certain to suffer."
- David Attenborough

If we keep emitting greenhouse gases at the current pace, scientists predict that the average global temperature will rise 4 degrees by 2100. To avoid the adverse effects of climate change from becoming increasingly severe, there is an urgent need to get our greenhouse gases emissions down to zero as early as possible. 


Otherwise, we need to get emissions down to net zero, which essentially means removing greenhouses gases from the atmosphere as much as we are putting in! 


But this is not as easy as it may sound. We cannot solely rely on natural sources to minimize, for instance, CO2 from the atmosphere. And technological solutions like carbon sequestration would be pretty expensive and require substantial permanent storage.


Switching from Coal, Oil, and Natural Gas to Clean energy and Fuels will take time. Still, we can mitigate the damage at the individual level by adopting sustainable living and lifestyle. 

Avoiding the effects of climate disasters won't be easy, but it is possible.

Comments

Popular

Advancing medicine with Patient-on-a-Chip

Innovating with Organ-on-a-Chip technology. It is well known that patients responds very uniquely to various drugs and chemicals. For instance, a drug may be effective for a patient while it makes another one more ill. For a long time, we had no test to check the effects and response of these medicine or line of treatment individually for each patient . Patient-on-a-Chip holds the potential to advance the field of precision medicine and provide  clinicians with better information which can accurately predict patient's response to medications and treatment.    Organ-on-a-Chip technology can be used to recapitulate true-to-life biology outside the human body. These advanced systems can create micro-environment where cells exhibit unprecedented level of biological functions and facilitates control over complex human biology and disease mechanism which arduous with other techniques.  Scientist can harvest cells from the skin or blood of the patient. These cells...

Frugal Science: Science for all

 Science is not just about knowing but also about experiencing.  Today with the boon of technological advancement we have easy access to information and knowledge which is merely a click away. Science is largely about learning and it comes through the experience. So, it's more important how you can make the experience of science more accessible to a lot of people around the world.  The actual experience of science is utilizing scientific tools to make your own discoveries. Prof. Manu Prakash at Stanford University is in a quest of how can we make scientific tools that are so affordable, which are like buying a pencil from a shop, So what it would mean if a scientific tool is as accessible as pencil? What you would actually do, would you sketch with it or would you write a poetry with it, what exactly is the end of that for science? Prakash Lab do this in different fields but mainly focusing on the microscopic world. So how do you make the microscopic world easily visible,...